Library / Case Studies
Multi-Clustering: Improving Resiliency and Stability of a Large-scale Monolithic API Service at LinkedIn
How do you increase the resiliency and stability of a monolithic API service that is used by three different platforms, serving 500+ million members, developed by over 400 engineers, deployed three times per day, and consuming almost 300 downstream services?
By LinkedIn engineers · LinkedIn · Added 2026-10-12
All content belongs to LinkedIn engineers / LinkedIn. We only link to it and give credit. Report a problem
Learn this case study
About 37 min left. Your work is saved as you go.
What you are about to study
LinkedIn explains a real system. You should know the basics: caching, queues and replication.
Ideas you will meet
- Microservices
- Decompose systems into independently deployable services.
- Resilience
- Timeouts, retries, circuit breakers, bulkheads and load shedding.
What we already know about this
Our own lessons on these ideas. Read them here before you start, so it makes sense.
Real-World Systems · 11 minHow microservices work togetherSynchronous calls, events, sagas and discovery: how separate services cooperate without becoming one tangled system.Read here
What a microservice architecture is
Instead of one large application, the system is split into small services, each responsible for one business capability (orders, payments, inventory, users). Services are deployed and scaled independently, often by different teams, and talk over the network.
The benefits are independent deployment, team autonomy and targeted scaling. The cost is that everything that used to be a function call is now a network call that can be slow or fail, and data is spread across services.
Ways services talk
Style How Good for Cost Synchronous request and response (REST, gRPC) Caller waits for the answer Queries and steps the user waits for Coupling in time; failures propagate Asynchronous messages and events (queues, streams) Caller publishes and moves on Reactions, workflows, decoupling Eventual consistency; harder to trace 100%Figure SDA-RWS-13-1 · Services: sync calls, events and owned data · © forcsguy.com
100%Figure SDA-RWS-13-2 · Two ways to run a multi-step process · © forcsguy.com
Before: a chain of synchronous calls
100%After: events between services
100%What changed
- A slow service no longer blocks the order
- New services can listen without changing the sender
- The result is eventually consistent, so design for that
Data ownership
Each service owns its own data and exposes it only through its API or events. No other service reads its tables. This keeps boundaries real, but it means you cannot join across services in SQL: you call APIs or keep read models built from events.
Keeping things consistent: sagas
A business action often spans services (take payment, reserve stock, create shipment). A single database transaction cannot cover them. A saga is a sequence of local transactions, each with a compensating action:
- Create the order (pending).
- Reserve stock. Compensation: release stock.
- Charge the payment. Compensation: refund.
- Confirm the order. If any step fails, run the compensations for earlier steps in reverse.
Two ways to run a saga:
- Choreography: services react to each other's events. Simple and decoupled, but the overall flow is spread out and hard to see.
- Orchestration: a coordinator (an orchestrator service or workflow engine) tells each service what to do next and handles failures. The flow is explicit and easier to reason about.
The outbox pattern
A service must update its database and publish an event, and one may succeed without the other. Write the event to an outbox table in the same transaction, and let a separate process publish it. Consumers must be idempotent, because delivery is at least once.
Finding and reaching services
- Service discovery (via the platform, DNS or a registry) tells callers where healthy instances are, since addresses change constantly.
- An API gateway is the front door for external clients: routing, authentication, rate limiting. A backend for frontend shapes responses for a specific client.
- A service mesh adds a sidecar proxy next to each service to provide mutual TLS, retries, timeouts and metrics without changing application code.
Resilience between services
Reuse the reliability tools: timeouts, retries with backoff and jitter, circuit breakers and bulkheads. Prefer asynchronous communication where a user does not need an immediate answer.
Operating many services
- Distributed tracing with a correlation id shows a request's path across services.
- Contract testing and careful API versioning let teams change without breaking each other.
- Beware the distributed monolith: services so entangled they must be deployed together, which gives you all the costs and none of the benefits. Split along business boundaries, not technical layers.
- Start with a well-structured monolith if the team is small. Split when a real need appears.
More on this site
Related reading
- Pattern: Transactional outboxChris Richardson · microservices.ioDocumentation
- Pattern: SagaChris Richardson · microservices.ioDocumentation
- Awesome MicroservicesMehdi Fornos · mfornosGitHub
- Microservices PatternsChris Richardson · ManningBooks
Show 6 moreShow fewer
- Tech Dummies: System Design Case StudiesNarendra L · Tech DummiesYouTube
- Payment Transaction Management in Microservices at MercariMercari engineers · MercariCase Studies
- Circuit BreakerMartin FowlerBlogs
- Avoiding insurmountable queue backlogsAmazon Builders' Library · Amazon Web ServicesBlogs
- Microservice Architecture at MediumMedium engineers · MediumCase Studies
- Back-end at FlickrFlickr engineers · FlickrCase Studies
Messaging and Microservice Patterns · 13 minOperating microservices: config, secrets, feature flags, tracing and loggingThe operational toolkit around a service: configuration and secrets done safely, feature flags for controlled releases, and traces and logs that follow a request across services.Read here
Configuration
Separate configuration from code. Anything that changes between environments (database address, feature limits, endpoints) should come from environment variables, config files or a config service, not be baked into the build ("build once, run anywhere").
- Keep defaults in code and overrides in the environment.
- Validate configuration at start-up and fail fast with a clear message.
- For values that must change at runtime, use a config service or watch a mounted file, and treat changes like deployments (versioned, reviewed, auditable).
- Keep config in version control (as code or templates) so changes are reviewed and reversible.
Secrets
Secrets (passwords, API keys, private keys, tokens) need stricter handling.
- Never commit them, put them in images, or print them in logs.
- Store them in a secrets manager (a cloud service, HashiCorp Vault, or an encrypted platform secret store) with access control, audit logs and encryption at rest.
- Inject at runtime (environment, mounted file or an agent), and use short-lived credentials where possible (cloud roles, dynamic database credentials).
- Rotate regularly and after any suspected leak; design services to reload secrets without downtime.
- Least privilege: each service gets only its own secrets.
Feature flags
A feature flag is a runtime switch controlling whether code runs, separate from deployment.
100%Figure SDA-MSV-05-1 · Deploy is not release · © forcsguy.com
Uses: gradual rollout, kill switches for risky features, A/B tests, per-customer entitlements, and decoupling release from deploy (see the deployment strategies lesson). Cautions: flags multiply test combinations, can be left in place forever, and a flag service outage must fail to a safe default.
Distributed tracing
A request through a microservice system touches many services. A trace records the whole journey as a tree of spans (one per operation), joined by a trace id passed in request headers.
100%Figure SDA-MSV-05-2 · One request traced across services · © forcsguy.com
- OpenTelemetry is the vendor-neutral standard for instrumentation (traces, metrics, logs) and the W3C Trace Context header standardises propagation.
- Propagate the id through every hop, including message queues (put it in message headers).
- Add useful attributes (user type, order size) but never secrets or personal data.
- Sampling: keep all errors and slow traces, a small share of the rest.
Centralised logging
Logs written on many short-lived instances are useless unless shipped to one searchable place.
- Write structured logs (JSON with fields: time, level, service, trace id, message, key attributes) to standard output; let the platform collect them.
- Ship to a central system (the ELK/OpenSearch stack, Loki, Splunk, cloud logging).
- Always include the trace id so logs and traces connect.
- Set levels sensibly; avoid logging personal data and secrets; set retention by value and legal need.
- Alert on log-derived signals sparingly; prefer metrics for alerting.
Health checks
Expose liveness (the process is alive; restart if not), readiness (ready to take traffic; remove from rotation if not) and optionally startup endpoints. Readiness should check what the service truly needs without cascading (a failing optional dependency should degrade, not mark the service unready for everyone).
A minimum for every service
A health endpoint, structured logs with trace ids, the standard metrics (request rate, errors, latency, saturation), propagated trace headers, config and secrets from the environment, and a runbook. The next lesson turns these signals into targets and alerts.
Real-world reading
Related reading
- Feature Toggles (aka Feature Flags)Pete Hodgson · Martin FowlerBlogs
- DevOps Roadmaproadmap.sh community · roadmap.shCourses
- Ensuring rollback safety during deploymentsAmazon Builders' Library · Amazon Web ServicesBlogs
- Dapper: a Large-Scale Distributed Systems Tracing Infrastructure (paper)Sigelman et al. · GooglePapers
Show 6 moreShow fewer
- Blue Green DeploymentMartin FowlerBlogs
- The Twelve-Factor AppAdam Wiggins · 12factor.netDocumentation
- XCMetrics: All-in-One Tool for Tracking Xcode Build Metrics at SpotifySpotify engineers · SpotifyCase Studies
- Going faster with continuous deliveryAmazon Builders' Library · Amazon Web ServicesBlogs
- Unicorn: Remediation System at eBayeBay engineers · eBayCase Studies
- Distributed Tracking, Tracing, and MeasuringOreilly engineers · OreillyCase Studies
Advanced Distributed Systems · 13 minResilience: timeouts, retries, bulkheads, backpressure and circuit breakersHow to stop one slow or failing dependency from taking everything down: the patterns, how they fit together and where each one goes wrong.Read here
The core problem
In a system of many services, slowness is more dangerous than failure. A dependency that fails fast is easy to handle. One that responds in 30 seconds makes callers hold threads, connections and memory until they too stop responding: a cascading failure. Resilience patterns limit how far a problem can spread.
The toolbox
100%Figure SDA-ADS-06-1 · Resilience layers around a call · © forcsguy.com
Timeouts
Every network call needs a timeout, including connect, read and overall. Pick from measured latency (for example slightly above the 99th percentile), not a guess, and make the caller's budget smaller than its own caller's so work is abandoned in an orderly way. Propagate deadlines across calls.
Retries
Retry only transient failures and only idempotent operations (or use idempotency keys). Use exponential backoff with jitter (random spread) so clients do not retry in lockstep, cap the attempts, and apply a retry budget (for example no more than 10 percent extra traffic). Retry at one layer, not at every layer, or attempts multiply.
Circuit breaker
A breaker watches failures or slow calls. Closed: normal. After too many failures it opens: calls fail immediately (or use the fallback) so the dependency can recover and callers stop wasting resources. After a cool-down it goes half-open: a few trial calls decide whether to close again.
100%Figure SDA-ADS-06-2 · Circuit breaker states · © forcsguy.com
Bulkheads
Partition resources so one dependency cannot consume them all: separate thread pools or connection pools per dependency, separate queues per tenant or per priority, or separate instances for critical paths. A slow recommendation service then cannot starve checkout.
Backpressure and load shedding
If producers outpace consumers, work piles up. Without limits the buffer grows until memory is exhausted or latency becomes huge. Options:
- Bounded queues that reject or block when full.
- Signalling upstream to slow down (credit-based flow in streaming systems, TCP windows, reactive streams).
- Load shedding: deliberately drop low-priority work early (return 429 or 503 quickly) to protect the rest.
- Rate limiting at the edge (see the rate-limiter lesson).
Failing fast and visibly under overload is better than accepting everything and failing slowly.
Fallbacks and graceful degradation
Return something useful when a dependency fails: cached data, a default, a simpler algorithm, or hide a non-essential section. Decide which features are essential before an incident, and test the degraded mode.
How they interact
- A timeout is the minimum; without it nothing else works.
- Retries inside a breaker inside a bulkhead is the usual nesting.
- Everything needs metrics: breaker state, rejected calls, queue depth, timeout counts. Alert on them.
- Test it: inject latency and failures (chaos experiments) to confirm the patterns work before production does it for you.
Common mistakes
Retries with no backoff; timeouts longer than the caller's; unbounded queues; a shared thread pool for everything; breakers that never close; fallbacks that call the same failing service; and testing only the happy path.
Real-world reading
Related reading
- Timeouts, retries, and backoff with jitterAmazon Builders' Library · Amazon Web ServicesBlogs
- Using load shedding to avoid overloadAmazon Builders' Library · Amazon Web ServicesBlogs
- Circuit BreakerMartin FowlerBlogs
- Circuit Breaker patternMicrosoft · Microsoft AzureDocumentation
Show 6 moreShow fewer
- Google SRE Book: Addressing Cascading FailuresGoogle SRE team · GoogleBlogs
- Chaos Monkey (source)Netflix · GitHubGitHub
- Bulkheads: Partition and Tolerate Failure in One PartSkife engineers · SkifeCase Studies
- Protector: Circuit Breaker for Time Series Databases at TrivagoTrivago engineers · TrivagoCase Studies
- Autoscaling Jenkins at TrivagoTrivago engineers · TrivagoCase Studies
- Troubleshooting a Connection Timeout Issue with tcp_tw_recycle Enabled at eBayeBay engineers · eBayCase Studies
Go deeper on this
A path through videos, articles, other case studies and code on the same ideas as Multi-Clustering: Improving Resiliency and Stability of a Large-scale Monolithic API Service at LinkedIn.
Warm upGet the vocabulary first.
Documentation
Cloud Design Patterns
A catalogue of design patterns for cloud systems with guidance on when to use each.
Microsoft AzureIntermediate
Books · Free from the author
Site Reliability Engineering
How Google runs production systems: SLOs, error budgets, monitoring and incident response. Free to read online from Google.
GoogleIntermediate
WatchHow others solve the same problem, on video.
Videos belong to their creators and play from YouTube. More on YouTube (opens in a new tab)
ReadEngineers explain it in their own words.
Blogs
Circuit Breaker
The pattern that stops calls to a failing dependency and tests recovery gradually.
Martin FowlerIntermediate
Blogs
Implementing health checks
Kinds of health checks, how load balancers use them, and how a careless check can take down a whole fleet.
Amazon Web ServicesIntermediate
See it in another companyThe same ideas, a different system.
Case Studies · Read here
Operate Kubernetes Reliably at Stripe
We recently built a distributed cron job scheduling system on top of Kubernetes, an exciting new platform for container orchestration. Kubernetes is very popular right now and makes a lot of exciting promises: one of ...
StripeIntermediate
Case Studies · Read here
Designing a Microservices Architecture for Failure
This article introduces the most common techniques and patterns to build and operate a highly available microservices architecture.
RisingstackIntermediate
Read the codeSee how it looks when it is real.
GitHub
Awesome Microservices
Curated tools, frameworks and reading material for building microservice systems.
mfornosIntermediate
GitHub
Engineering Blogs
A huge directory of company engineering blogs to learn from real production systems.
kilimchoiIntermediate
Keep learning
Loading community…